By Georgina M. Montgomery
A better half to the historical past of yankee Science deals a set of essays that provide an authoritative review of the latest scholarship at the heritage of yank science.
- Covers issues together with astronomy, agriculture, chemistry, eugenics, vast technological know-how, army expertise, and more
- Features contributions via the main entire students within the box of technological know-how history
- Covers pivotal occasions in U.S. historical past that formed the advance of technology and technology coverage comparable to WWII, the chilly battle, and the Women’s Rights movement
Read or Download A Companion to the History of American Science PDF
Similar history & philosophy books
The nice biologist Louis Pasteur suppressed 'awkward' facts since it did not aid the case he used to be making. John Snow, the 'first epidemiologist' used to be doing not anything others had no longer performed earlier than. Gregor Mendel, the intended 'founder of genetics' by no means grasped the elemental ideas of 'Mendelian' genetics.
"Fabulous technological know-how unearths a lot of those findings to the final reader for the 1st time. frequently startling and regularly spell binding, they exhibit that a few of our most crucial clinical theories have been at the start authorized purely simply because well-known scientists fudged info, pulled rank, or have been propped up by way of spiritual and political elites.
The talk among divine motion, or religion, and typical choice, or technological know-how, is garnering large curiosity. This e-book ventures way past the standard, contrasting American Protestant and atheistic issues of view, and likewise contains the views of Jews, Muslims, and Roman Catholics. It includes arguments from a few of the proponents of clever layout, creationism, and Darwinism, and in addition covers the delicate factor of ways to include evolution into the secondary tuition biology curriculum.
Whilst that the examine of nonlinear dynamics got here into its personal in the
sctences, the focal point of literary stories shifted towards neighborhood, fragmentary modes of
analysis during which texts have been now not considered as deterministic or predictable.
N. Katherine Hayles right here investigates parallels among modern literature and demanding conception and the rising interdisciplinary box referred to as the
science of chaos. She reveals in either medical and literary discourse new interpretations of chaos, that is obvious now not as affliction yet as a locus of maximum
information and complexity. the recent paradigm of chaos contains parts that,
Hayles indicates, have been obvious in literary conception and literature prior to they became
prominent within the sciences. She asserts that such similarities among the natural
and human sciences are the outcome no longer of direct impact yet of roots in a
common cultural matrix.
Hayles lines the evolution of the concept that of chaos and evaluates the paintings of
such theorists as Prigogine, Feigenbaum, and Mandelbrot, for whom chaos
entails an unpredictably open universe within which wisdom is restricted to local
sites and medical versions can by no means exhaust the probabilities of the particular. But
this view doesn't suggest that scientists have given up the hunt for international causes of normal phenomena, for chaos is conceived of as containing its own
form of order. Hayles envisions chaos as a double-edged sword: it may be viewed
either as a attractiveness that ailment performs a extra very important position in natural
processes than had hitherto been famous or as an extension of order into areas
that had hitherto resisted formalization. She examines constructions and topics of
disorder within the schooling of Henry Adams, Doris Lessing's Golden Notebook,
and works via Stanislaw Lem. Hayles concludes through exhibiting how the writings of
poststmcturalist theorists contain primary positive factors of chaos theory-such as
an curiosity in touching on neighborhood websites to worldwide stmctures; a notion of order and
disorder as interpenetrating instead of hostile; an understanding that during complex
systems small explanations can result in gigantic results; and an figuring out that
complex structures may be either deterministic and unpredictable.
Chaos certain will give a contribution to and liven up present debates between chaos
theorists, cultural critics and cultural historians, serious theorists, literary
critics attracted to 19th- and twentieth-century literature, researchers in
nonlinear dynamics, and others curious about the relation among science
- You Failed Your Math Test, Comrade Einstein: Adventures and Misadventures of Young Mathematicians or Test Your Skills in Almost Recreational Mathematics
- Science under Control: The French Academy of Sciences 1795-1914
- Epistemology and Political Philosophy in Gilbert Simondon: Individuation, Technics, Social Systems
- Great scientists speak again
Extra info for A Companion to the History of American Science
Those collections were in service of a perennial project in American anthropology; with them Hrdliˇcka and his collaborators worked to identify connections between American Indian nations and establish the patterns of their ancestors’ migration into the Americas. As anthropology found an expanding home in the universities, Earnest A. Hooton (1887–1954) emerged as a prominent academic leader in physical anthropology. Hooton earned a doctorate in classics at the University of Wisconsin before taking up a professorship at Harvard, where he became an authority on human evolution.
1022). One of the basic commitments of early agricultural scientists included the fundamental belief that increasing productivity was an unproblematic goal of agricultural research (Rosenberg 1997), as most if not all humans are vulnerable to food-borne risk and food and fiber are of paramount importance when meeting basic human needs (Thompson and Noll 2014). The technologies developed from this research placed farmers on what is commonly called the “technology treadmill,” as producers who refused or could not afford to implement technological advances commonly found themselves out of business (Hightower 1975; MacKenzie 1991).
By 1996, the Environmental Protection Agency had granted 35 approvals to commercially grow 8 genetically engineered crops and, by 2000, scientists developed “golden rice,” which was the first genetic engineering project aimed at increasing the nutrient value of food. Especially prominent debates on genetic modification include disputes over the ownership and patenting of genetic resources, potential health risks of these products, whether or not such products should be labeled, which types of transformations are or are not acceptable, animal welfare issues, and potential ecosystem effects (Lynas and Tudge 2014; Thompson and Noll 2014).